Financial Imperialism

HSBC and Britain’s Informal Empire in China

by Jason Wu

The tapestry of global power dynamics has long reflected an intricate dance between finance and statecraft. Their liaison was particularly formative in the context of Britain’s informal empire in China, which traversed the 19th and 20th centuries. During that period, the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC) became a linchpin in the web of overseas financial imperialism meticulously woven back in London. In navigating the complexities of international relations, HSBC transcended the mere contours of economic transactions. It became an instrument of financial and geopolitical control, pivotal to the reinforcement of British dominance over China.

The genesis of Britain’s informal empire in China lay in the wake of the First Opium War, as the prospect of economic expansion increasingly steered colonial pursuits. At the war’s end in 1843, the Treaty of Nanking marked a watershed moment for British access to Chinese consumer markets. London imposed war indemnities in astronomical figures and forced open the gates of commerce, imperative to reverse its huge trade deficit with China. Herein that intricate interplay between geopolitics and finance came to define Britain’s informal empire in China. The Second Opium War further solidified British control in Chinese public finances and foreign policy, setting the stage for a nuanced strategy that blended military coercion with financial machinations.

At the heart of this imperial orchestration stood HSBC: a financial colossus established, in 1865, by the British in Hong Kong. HSBC capitalized on its geographic proximity to China proper and Chinese clients, which enabled it to assume an increasing share of regional transactions. The corporation even aligned itself with the Chinese silver standard while Britain adhered to the gold standard. This shrewd maneuver enabled HSBC to swiftly respond to the financial exigencies of the region, outpacing its competitors and establishing dominance in the financial circles of the Far East. By 1913, it stood as the largest bank in Asia, with total assets reaching a staggering £39.5 million.

HSBC’s ascendancy was not merely an economic triumph; rather, it was the manifestation of a meticulous strategy to intertwine financial control with geopolitical influence. The loans and securities business of HSBC became instrumental in reinforcing Chinese financial dependence on Britain, as the bank assumed the role of the chief purveyor of loans to the Chinese imperial government for war indemnities. The Treaty of Nanking and the Convention of Peking indemnity payments alone amounted to nearly £7 million, a figure that surpassed the average annual budget of the entire British Royal Navy at the time. The resulting Chinese debt became a tool for British manipulation. Peking could be held financially hostage as Britain continued to reap untold profits, which in turn funded its colonial enterprises.

British influence over China further unfolded through the political conditions attached to HSBC’s financial services. London actively encouraged HSBC to issue loans to the Chinese government while the British-controlled Imperial Maritime Customs Service (IMCS) acting as guarantor of profits, relying on tax revenues paid by the Chinese themselves. The political concessions extracted alongside these loans, particularly in the form of railway projects, underscored a deliberate strategy to ensure economic subservience. Notably, HSBC—in coordination with the British government—coerced China into a monopolistic arrangement by which it procured raw materials and construction goods exclusively from Britain, in exchange for war indemnity loans. This collusion exemplifies the intricate dance between private economic interests and broader imperial objectives. The weakening Chinese state, rendered financially vulnerable by successive military defeats, became the canvas upon which HSBC and the British government painted a portrait of economic colonization.

As the 20th century dawned, the legacy of financial imperialism endured, shaping the trajectory of China’s economic evolution and leaving an indelible mark on the annals of international relations. HSBC’s role in Britain’s informal empire-building in China stands as a testament to the potent fusion of finance and geopolitics, a pattern that continues to echo through the corridors of history. Though ostensibly a mere financial institution, HSBC catalyzed the British colonial enterprise. Together they brought the Middle Kingdom to its knees, forcing it to pay for its own subjugation.

Jason Wu is a senior at Tufts University studying International Relations and Computer Science.

Image: The HSBC bronze lions, known as Stephen and Stitt

Image courtesy: South China Morning Post

Works Cited

Dean, Britten. “British Informal Empire: The Case of China.” The Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, vol. 14, no. 1, 1976, pp. 64–81., https://doi.org/10.1080/14662047608447250.

Kohli, Atul. “Britain’s Informal Empire.” Imperialism and the Developing World, 2020, pp. 69–146., https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190069629.003.0003.

Nishimura, Shizuya. “The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, 1870–1913.” The Origins of International Banking in Asia, 2012, pp. 112–121., https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646326.003.0005.

———. “British International Banks in Asia, 1870–1914.” The Origins of International Banking in Asia, 2012, pp. 55–79., https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646326.003.0003.

Porter, Bernard. The Lion’s Share: A Short History of British Imperialism, 1850-2004. Pearson Longman, 2012.